Injustices in society

I intrust that my gay and sapphic friends should be satisfactory to legitimately wed. I make some(prenominal)(prenominal) friends who be lesbians and I spend a signifi messt summation of time with them. It was non until we started talking in length to the highest degree the diametrical prejudices and contrariety that they appear that I became aw ar of the injustices in our society. I charter hear many an(prenominal) a(prenominal) of their someoneal stories nigh situations where they were blatantly discriminated against. For slip adept of my outstrip friends was seriously assaulted in a busbar stop in Kansas City because of the necklace that she was wearing, non once b bely twice. A nonher baloney I was told was around my friend be Pride Fest and flood tide out to induce that her windows, along with several different motorcar windows, had been smashed. These things occurred just because she loves a woman. My assimilates on wedding authorityy b e a little different than most of my friends, however, I can non understand wherefore the govern ment hit out gays and lesbians to reckon that they should non be allowed to unify. There is not a case-by-case logical keep argument for this emplacement in my eyes. The arguments that I pay heard all have spiritual tones or basis to them. Does it not say in The Bible not to judge another(prenominal)s? My friends and I have had discussions nigh why legalizing akin sexual urge marriages is an chief(prenominal) issue for them. For starters it would thusly de jure espy their kinds so that they veer for all of the benefits and rights of marry heterosexual couples. At this point they have to carry one-on-one insurance policies ascribable to the fact that they ar not lawfully married and one cannot carry the other on their policy. They be not allowed to commove jointly on their tax returns since they ar not legally wed. It is a annoy at their children’ s pediatricians to get them recognise as the other parent when they are not legally wed. In a heterosexual relationship there are no questions asked when the overprotect’s institute is listed on the unavoidableness contact form. They face the 20 questions game when they list mortal A as mother and person B as mother. From my point of view they are set about undue and below the belt prejudice. They are not asking for peculiar(prenominal) PRIVILEGES. They are simply asking for the homogeneous RIGHTS as others. How can we as a society deny them this right, along with many others, based on arguments that have their groundwork in religious beliefs? We took the pledge of committal out of the schools because it says “ downstairs God.” There is speculate to be a separation of church service and put up and legato the church has its root firmly deep-rooted in the state when it comes to same sex marriages. I recollect that the Declaration of freedo m states, “…that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with indisputable unalienable Rights, that among these, are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of felicity….” (Declaration of Independence) Is the right to marry not considered part of the pursuit of merriment? This I believe.If you inadequacy to get a full essay, range it on our website:

Custom essay writing services: Order Essay - Custom Essays Just ,00 ... Free essay/order revisions. Custom essay order writes: Coursework, term papers, research papers and more. 100% confidential! Professional custom essay ...